Yahoo: 'Tumor' of Israel will soon be destroyed: Ahmadinejad (Tumor - Zionist regime: Ahmadinejad, in his speech, claimed that "Zionists" triggered World Wars I and II, and had "taken control over world affairs since the moment they became dominant over the US government." - In 1913 via the Federal Reserve. Hitler was funded by the same bankers and if there wasn’t ever a WW2, then there wouldn’t have been a bible prophecy of Israel. Bible illustrates both good and evil and was written or manipulated by man, not God (Energy)) - 8.17.2012
Reuters: Iran's Ahmadinejad says no place for Israel in new Middle East - 8.17.2012
Associated Press: Iran: Israel's existence 'insult to all humanity' - 8.17.2012
Time: The Rise and Fall of the Shah of Iran (Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi officially ruled Iran from 1941 to 1979. A 1953 coup in support of Pahlavi — backed by the Americans and British — failed and the Shah was forced to flee. But after a second plot staged a few days later succeeded, Pahlavi was allowed to return to power.) - 8.17.2012
Washington Post: Iran (The shah fled Iran but returned when monarchist elements forced Mussadegh from office in Aug., 1953; covert U.S. activity was largely responsible for Mussadegh's ousting.) - 8.17.2012
JPost: Khamenei: Zionist regime will disappear from map - 8.15.2012
Washington Times: KAHLILI: Iran admits giving WMDs to terrorists (Were there WMDs in Iraq?) - 8.14.2012
Associated Press: Anti-Semitic politician has Jewish roots (Infowars.com: Israel to Demand Guarantee Obama Will Attack Iran - The term Zionist was created in the 1900s. Before the term Zionist there were Jews getting kicked out of a hundred countries hundreds of times in history for these same reasons. And there were Jews mass murdering Goyim and Gentiles based on the Talmud, hundreds of times in history. And their racial hate of everything non-Jew. They are criminal filth. The term anti-Semitism is often incorrectly used by “Jews” to smear and discredit non-Jews who are looking for truth in history. If one tells the truth about the Jews, such as “The Jews own Hollywood” (something they admit to each other), or “The Jews own the media” (something they brag about among themselves), one is considered an “anti-Semite.” This is a clever subterfuge to eliminate any criticism of any Jew for anything. If any Jews happen to be involved in any under-handed or even illegal activities, and someone exposes that activity, that person is branded an “anti-Semite.” It is a convenient way for them to avoid dealing directly with the truth of the issues. So instead, they viciously attack the messenger. People shouldn’t avoid issues with name calling; refute them with arguments, reason and facts. Where are your arguments? All one gets are the same dreary set of accusations and a veiled threat to expose him to the thought police. If racism is alive, well and thriving, it is surly in Israel. Is not urging the most powerful nation on earth to attack another country a threat, a very real one? Zionism was first coined in 1891 by the Austrian publicist Nathan Birnbaum.) – 8.14.2012
Yahoo: Iran confident Israel won't launch 'stupid' attack - 8.14.2012
Reuters: Iran government criticized over earthquake response (Of course, ours was criticized for Katrina. Governments don't care of you or those organized within it, it's the civilians always or tax payers which does fund the government) - 8.13.2012
BBC: Q&A: Standard Chartered Iran allegations (Iran has been subject to US economic sanctions since 1979, when the shah was overthrown and Islamic militants took 52 Americans hostage inside the US embassy in Tehran. The laws were toughened by executive orders signed by Presidents Ronald Reagan in 1987 and Bill Clinton in 1995.) - 8.7.2012
LA Times: U.S. moving submersibles to Persian Gulf to oppose Iran - 7.12.2012
Associated Press: US Piles More Sanctions on Iran (More acts of war) - 7.12.2012
Press TV: Pentagon admits lethality, effectiveness of Iran missile systems - 7.11.2012
CBS: Annan: Iran must be "part of the solution" to Syria crisis (The United States has also rejected Iranian participation in international meetings on the Syrian crisis.) - 7.10.2012
LA Times: Former CIA spy advocates overthrow of Iranian regime (After graduating from USC, Kahlili returned to Iran just before the 1979 revolution toppled the Shah. A childhood friend recruited him into the Revolutionary Guard, where he gained an insider's access to the new Islamic government — and where he was to turn against the regime.) - 7.6.2012
Reuters: Iran says can destroy U.S. bases "minutes after attack" - 7.4.2012
Newsmax: War With Iran is Biggest Risk to Global Economy - 5.3.2012
Newsmax: Israelis: Best Time to Bomb Iran Is During US Election Campaign - 5.2.2012
ABC: New US Stealth Fighters Now at Iran’s Back Door - 4.27.2012
CBS: Government Secretly Prepares To Evacuate Chicago During NATO Summit - 4.26.2012
BBC: Obama unveils tech sanctions against Iran and Syria – 4.23.2012Israel Prepares for War - Israel said Egypt is more dangerous to Israel than Iran Treasure Hunter Fears Assassination Over Search For Bin Laden’s Body
Guardian: Critics Say Iran Attack Would Be Illegal Under International Law
ABC: Iran Claims Arrests of Israeli 'Terrorists' (The statement also said that the government's apprehension of the "devils led to the discovery of of the Zionists' regional command center" in a third country. )
Telegraph: Israel ‘would not be able to destroy Iran’s nuclear programme with pre-emptive air strike’ (While Israel has the most powerful air force in the Middle East, it would struggle to mount the complex strikes necessary to deal a real blow to Iran's well protected nuclear plants.)
Guardian: Iran can make nuclear weapons — but won’t, says top politician (Ahmadinejad doesn’t need some Iranian scientists developing nukes. He can easily purchase these in the black market from Mossad or North Korea. That's they are just doing it for nuclear power or energy. Either way what is with this attitude of we can do something but everyone else can't? Such arrogance and that attitude is a sinful or satanic attitude that seems to be within most Americans who have become NAZI. Bush actually wanted to get rid of Ahmadinejad using non-lethals. Guess who came in rescuing Ahmadinejad? It was Mossad from what I’m hearing.)
YouTube: Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?
Reuters: Could bombing Iran push it to build the Bomb?
Reuters: Senate to Consider More Iran Sanctions
CNN: Fareed Zakaria answers your questions on nuclear weapons (“It would never make sense to attack Israel because you would never be able to prevent that retaliatory response. If there were to be credible evidence that a country like Iran had nuclear weapons - and I think we’re a long way off from that - it might well make sense for Israel to remind the world publicly that it does have nuclear weapons and that it does have the survivable second-strike capacity. It would be sending a signal to Iran saying, “Don’t even think about using them on us because we can nuke you back and we could nuke you back even if your weapons destroyed Israel.” It is this logic that makes the Iranians understand they would be destroyed and would deter them just as it deterred the Soviets, Mao, the Pakistanis and the North Koreans.” – And remember, in all the existence of Iran, they haven’t attacked anybody so why would they start now? I believe Iran actually has the most Jews living in their country than any other so called country different from Israel.)
Guardian: Ian McEwan: misery of attack on Iran would be beyond belief (“Ian McEwan, the writer whose 2005 novel Saturday was widely interpreted as making the case for military intervention in Iraq…(a lie) and any attack on Iran with the aim of destroying its nuclear capability would end in disaster." - thank you.)
FOX: NYPD says Iran has conducted surveillance in New York City (Silber cycled a string of incidents where law enforcement questioned Iranians, who turned out to be working with the Iranian mission to the United Nations or otherwise tied to the government. But government officials have said there are no known or specific threats indicating Iranian plans to attack inside the U.S. )
YouTube: We Love You – Iran & Israel (Quote-“I think this message represents general sentiment of most ordinary citizens in all countries. It is government that usually devises propaganda and tries to convince us to hate one another to further their material interests.”)
Newsmax: LIGNET: The War With Iran That’s Already Begun
Jerusalem Post: ‘US warns Iran: Accede or be attacked’ (“The unusually stark warning by the US was passed on by Secretary of State Hilary Clinton to her Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov, after the two met in New York on Monday, the diplomatic source told the Russian newspaper.” - Clinton can’t just go round stating this is the last chance or else war. She has no authority to say such a thing. The only people who van say this legally is the US Congress. It is only the congress who can legally go to war therefore it is only the congress who can threaten people with war! Hillary needs to be bought down to size; she is a totally insane woman IMO. Proof: anyone who waves their hands in the air saying “we came we saw he died” (regarding gadaffi) can only be a complete nutcase.)
CBS: Ex-Mossad chief: Iran rational; don't attack now (Former chief of Israel's Mossad tells Lesley Stahl Iran is a "rational regime" in an interview about Iran's pursuit of a nuclear bomb. Watch Stahl's report on Sunday, March 11 at 7 p.m. ET/PT.)
Press TV: 58% of Israelis oppose military strike on Iran
Press TV: Pentagon ‘very worried’ about Iran war
CBS: Kerry: Romney's behavior on Iran "irresponsible"
EU MP Nigel Farage: ‘War on Terror is War on Liberty’
What are they REALLY digging for in that sandbox? The Central Bank. It’s not about Iran having a nuclear weapon; it’s about Rothschild wanting to control the country via his private central bank. You have two forms of Freedom and independence, one from a banking standpoint and another via laws for the people. Iran is very similar to America prior to 1913 right now, having a state run bank by it’s people, except the people or it’s government doesn’t have a Bill of rights. Rothschild wants to control Iran via his own private central bank. Federal Reserve or not in American, our government is violating the Bill of Rights, the freedom or liberties of its people.
NY Times: Attack on Iran Could Blow Back Here at Home - 2.29.2012
Euronews: Stratfor Emails: Israel Has Destroyed Iran’s Nuclear Program (This article gets it wrong…… The real target in Iran is the Iranian CENTRAL BANK. Come on do your homework before rambling on here. What was the first thing they did in Libya ? Replace the bank……They cant have any challenges to their funny money system here.)
Reuters: Iran says making nuclear bombs a "great sin"
Press TV: Israel to attack Iran without US permission (I say fine, you are on your own. You can take care of yourself; after all, we’ve built or funded everything you have. )
Reuters: Iran may be "struggling" with new nuclear machines
Washington Times: Attacking Iran’s nuke sites may only slow progress
Associated Press: Israeli attack on Iran might pull US into new war (why is that? Israel can defend herself if she wants to attack someone of no threat)
Newsmax: Putin: Nuclear Iran Would Destabilize World (Isn’t that already happening without a Nuclear Iran?)
Reuters: Russia warns Israel not to attack Iran
Press TV: Gen. Dempsey: Iran rational actor, not after nukes (“We are of the opinion that Iran is a rational actor. We also know, or we believe we know that Iran has not decided to make a nuclear weapon.” - Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey)
Reuters: Signs of Iran activity in Yemen, US envoy “says” (and we all know how much the Federal Corporation lies. Iraq with WMDs?)
Reuters: Iran stops oil sales to British and French firms
Associated Press: US, Britain urge Israel not to attack Iran
Press TV: Japan warns Israel against attacking Iran
Newsmax: Netanyahu: Iran Sanctions Not Working (shocking! Sarcasm)
Doug Casey: Is a US-Iran War Inevitable?
Doug: In any event, why shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons? I wish none of these countries had them, but they do. No one stopped China, no one stopped North Korea, Pakistan, Israel, India, France, nor any of the others in the disreputable club that have them.
L: But they're part of the axis of evil, don't you know?
Doug: Speaking of evil, it's evil to initiate the use of force or fraud. If Iran enriches uranium or even builds tools for war, that's not evil per se. But using force to stop them from doing something that is not in itself wrong is wrong, and that would make Iran's attackers the axis of evil.
In my mind, the US is the biggest threat to peace in the world today. I can easily imagine those in power in the US starting a war over any silly pretext, real or imagined. It could easily happen by accident at this point. Things go wrong. Maybe some young hotheads in Iran's Revolutionary Guard decide to take a boat out and attack a US frigate – launch a few RPGs at it before they're blown out of the water. Then the US feels it needs to mete out some punishment and launches a strike against the base the boat came from – which would be attacking the Iranian mainland – and the thing spins completely out of control. Could happen at the drop of a hat. Maybe the commander of a US ship has a streak of General Jack D. Ripper from Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove in him. Maybe the Russians or the Chinese – who are aiding the Iranians – mount a false-flag incident, because they want to see the US get involved in another tar baby.
Gold is the logical choice and the next step in the demise of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. There's a lot of demand for the dollar to buy and sell oil. If countries stop using it, demand for the dollar would fall, at the very time the US is greatly increasing the supply of dollars. The day is coming when trillions of dollars outside the US will only be spendable inside the US. At that point it's game over for the dollar.
L: You've talked about the world going back onto a gold standard before. What do you say to the people who say that gold is a barbaric relic from the past that doesn't work in a modern economy – they can't go around with pockets full of doubloons to buy cars or chests full of treasure to buy houses…
Doug: Such people are not thinking rationally and are economically ignorant. As always, we should start with a definition: what is money? The short answer is that it's a store of wealth and medium of exchange. For reasons we've discussed and as Aristotle outlined over 2,000 years ago, gold is simply the best form of money ever adopted. And in our modern world, you don't have to physically cart the stuff around. You can, but you can also transfer ownership of physical gold electronically, through services like GoldMoney.com.
NY Daily News: Feds see no specific terror threat against the U.S. (“There's "no credible or specific" evidence of an Iranian terror plot targeting the U.S” – Infowars.com report)
NY Post: Iran helping al Qaeda plot attack on West, intelligence sources say (al CIAduh, funded via the Pentagon. In reality, the truth is the exact opposite, the United States, Britain and Israel have once again teamed up with Al-Qaeda to attack Iran, but just like the manufactured hoax about Mohamed Atta meeting with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague in 2001, a fabricated alliance between Iran and Al-Qaeda has been invented to grease the skids for war. Infowars.com report)
Jerusalem Post: ‘Mossad chief probed US reaction to unilateral Iran strike’ (Mossad chief sought info on Washington's reaction if Israel were to unilaterally strike Iran, 'Newsweek' reports. - We funded you, we gave everything to you, you bend over to US! It is not your job or any bodies to fund terrorism around the world. It's not your job to bomb innocent people. I want the Zionist regime wiped off the face of this earth and that includes the scum in Washington controlling our politics known as AIPAC)
FOX: Israel accuses Iran of bombings in Georgia, India (Iran denied responsibility for the attacks. “Today we witnessed two attempts of terrorism against innocent civilians,” Prime Minister told a gathering of lawmakers from his Likud Party. “Iran is behind these attacks and it is the largest terror exporter in the world.” he said. (no, that would be Israel) “The United States places a high priority on the safety and security of diplomatic personnel around the world and we stand ready to assist with any investigation of these cowardly actions," she said.(what about your cowardly acts?) "Iran's response will be a tormenting one for supporters of state terrorism," he said, without elaborating. "The enemies of the Iranian nation, especially the United States, Britain and the Zionist regime, or Israel, have to be held responsible for their activities.")
Yahoo: U.S. Navy: Iran prepares suicide bomb boats in Gulf (“MANAMA (Reuters) - Iran has built up its naval forces in the Gulf and prepared boats that could be used in suicide attacks, but the U.S. Navy can prevent it from blocking the Strait of Hormuz” – which is the pretext to starting full on war! Iran already stated you block the straight and its war. Iran is doing this because of Sanctions! - an act of war. “But ever since al Qaeda suicide bombers in a small boat killed 17 sailors on board the destroyer U.S.S. Cole in a port in Yemen in 2000” Al Qaeda = CIA. The leaders DINE at the Pentagon! “The United States and EU have both imposed new sanctions on Iran's central bank which make it difficult for countries to pay Tehran for oil and for Iran to pay for the goods it imports.”)
Newsmax: Schork: Mideast War Would Spark US Depression (The problems you state as a result is exactly what the elite want)
Press TV: ‘US army ready to engage in Iran War’
Reuters: Iran navy starts 10-day wargame in Strait of Hormuz
Daily Mail: US/UK missiles hit Iranian village day before Hormuz war ‘game’ (Two American missiles struck a village in south-west Iran early today. We've been at war with Iran for years already via Sanctions so this doesn't surprise me.)
FOX: Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Sue Swiss Bank for Helping Fund Terrorists(the Swiss bank made it possible for Iran to fund the terrorists.) - 5.13.2008
Noam Chomsky: On U.S. Policy Towards Iran (there is no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran. In 1953, the United States and Britain overthrew the parliamentary government and installed a brutal dictator, the Shah, who ruled until 1979. And during his rule, incidentally, the United States was strongly supporting the same programs they're objecting to today. In 1979, the population overthrew the dictator, and since then the United States has been essentially torturing Iran. First it tried a military coup. Then it supported Saddam Hussein during Iraq's invasion of Iran, which killed hundreds of thousands of people. Then, after that was over, the United States started imposing harsh sanctions on Iran. And now it's escalating that. The point is: Iran is out of control. You know, it's supposed to be a U.S.-client state, as it was under the Shah, and it's refusing to play that role. - Read More) - 7.19.2007
Telegraph: Ayatollah's grandson calls for US overthrow of Iran (The grandson of Ayatollah Khomeini, the inspiration of Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, has broken a three-year silence to back the United States military to overthrow the country's clerical regime.) - 6.18.2006
Noam Chomsky: Telling the Truth about Imperialism (Finally a joint British-American coup did succeed in organizing an overthrow of the regime, and restored the Shah to power. Then comes 25 years of terror, atrocities, violence, finally leading to the revolution in 1979 and the overthrow of the Shah. But your point is quite correct. Regime change is normal policy–in fact, it’s even perfectly conceded. So, for example, maybe five years ago during the Clinton administration, the European Union (EU) brought to the World Trade Organization (WTO) a complaint against the United States, for the extended economic warfare against Cuba, which extended to secondary boycotts that are illegal under every possible interpretation of international law and have been condemned by every relevant institution. The EU brought it to the WTO as a restraint of trade and the Clinton administration simply told them, Europe is challenging policies of ours that go back to 1959 and which are aimed at overthrowing the government of Cuba (regime change) and Europe has no business interfering in the internal affairs of the United States like this.) - 11.12.2003
LA Times: The overthrow of democracy in Iran (The coup was the first of a series of secret U.S. interventions to overthrow popular elected governments, including those in Guatemala (1954) and Chile (1973), and to replace them with regimes that were, like the shah's, oppressive and unpopular. Because growing dissent had no licit political outlet, Ayatollah Khomeini and those clergy who followed him grew stronger and, in 1978, encouraged the series of popular demonstrations that led to the shah's overthrow in February 1979. The coup gave heart to U.S. leaders who wanted to overthrow governments considered threats, yet the ultimate anti-U.S. "blowback" against these operations in Iran and elsewhere has not inhibited future plans to change other governments. - Read More) - 7.6.2003
Chicago Tribune: U.S. could face costly lessons in fight with Iran (The U.S. joined in after World War II and with its support for the 1953 coup that restored the shah to his throne, became the principal manipulators. The nuclear option has been a long cherished Iranian goal, first pursued by the shah in the 1970s when the policy was supported by the United States.) - 6.2.2003
Constitutional Rights Foundation: BRIA 15 1 b The U.S. and Iran: Time for a New Beginning? (The United States, however, viewed the shah as a strong ally in the Cold War with the Soviet Union. Consequently, the United States sent him weapons, aircraft, naval vessels, and other forms of military aid. As the shah’s rule became increasingly dictatorial, opposition grew against him and his ally, the United States. Islamic religious leaders such as the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini spoke out against the shah and were arrested and forced into exile. Public demonstrations broke out in 1978, with the shah’s army sometimes firing into the crowds, killing many. Widespread opposition forced the shah to flee Iran in January 1979. He ended up in the United States where he underwent surgery for cancer. But many Iranians believed that the United States was protecting the shah and plotting to restore him to power. Meanwhile, the Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Iran from exile and formed an Islamic revolutionary government. But no one was really in control. President Carter applied economic pressure on the new regime in Iran. He canceled a military equipment shipment, placed an embargo on oil from Iran, and froze $12 billion in Iranian assets held in American banks. - Read More) - 7.6.1998
History: CIA-assisted coup overthrows government of Iran (The Iranian military, with the support and financial assistance of the United States government, overthrows the government of Premier Mohammed Mosaddeq and reinstates the Shah of Iran. Iran remained a solid Cold War ally of the United States until a revolution ended the Shah's rule in 1979.) - 8.19.1953