Washington Post: From tracking al-Qaeda to tracking the wayward spouse (Big Brother Inc: Homeland Security creeps into the bedroom - What began as a well-intentioned campaign to harden targets and protect the nation from terrorists (who you calling a terrorist?) has metastasized into a sprawling and diffuse enterprise that has little to do with terrorists and a lot to do with government and employers spying on the citizenry — and citizens spying on each other. Catch many terrorists with this technology? “Not so much,” Cellbusters’ Derek Forde admitted.) - 4.3.2012
Career Services: Five Lifestyle Activities That Can Get You Fired (wow, big brother (federal corporation) has done a great job getting into the private sector of your jobs & your personal life effecting human rights! God, humanity has no idea what is in stored for them) - 1.27.2012Infowars.com:
“In the far
distance a helicopter skimmed down between the roofs, hovered for an instant
like a bluebottle, and darted away again with a curving flight. It was the
police patrol, snooping into people’s windows.”
America in 2011 is more advanced than Orwell’s Oceania in that it
doesn’t have to rely on expensive helicopters to spy on citizens. That job has now been entrusted to unmanned drones that not only act as surveillance
devices, they can also carry tasers that deliver incapaciating electric shocks
to “suspected” criminals.
Facecrime is now a reality in 2011 with the aid of
behaviometrics – a new omnipresent surveillance
technology developed for the US Air Force and destined to be used in law
enforcement to “monitor suspicious behavior”. The system revolves around a camera
that tracks facial movements biometrically in order to build a psychological
profile of the individual under surveillance. The movements of the muscles in
your face will alert Big Brother, through the process of “behavior analysis,”
to your presence as a suspicious individual who may be engaging in the act of
thought crime, or God forbid, planning a public protest.
As part of
Homeland Security’s See Something, Say Something program, Americans are being
bombarded at every level, from Wal-Mart, to football games, to hotel rooms,
with messages encouraging them t to report their fellow citizens for engaging
in “suspicious activity,” which as we have documented, includes mundane
behavior such as paying with cash, opposing surveillance, using a video camera,
talking to police officers, wearing hoodies, driving vans, writing on a piece
of paper, and using a cell phone recording application.
Schools are also now training children to be “eco-spies” by reporting on their parents’ bad recycling habits, encouraging kids to “re-educate” them into compliance.
Just
as the citizens of Oceania were constantly bombarded with propaganda from the
state via telescreens, Americans are now being subjected to the same onslaught
in the form of spurious “alerts” from the federal government that are delivered
through numerous platforms, including LED screens on
the ‘Intellistreets’ lighting network, televisions at
Wal-Mart storesthat play Janet
Napolitano’s “See Something, Say Something” diatribe, FEMA’s Emergency
Alert System that can hijack all conventional boradcast communications, and mandatory government messages that will appear on all
new cellphones from the end of next year. And if that isn’t enough, the Washington Post
today called for the Internet to also be brought under
the auspices of a government takeover switch. Whereas Winston Smith only had to
put up with Big Brother lecturing him via telescreens, Americans will be
peppered with propaganda from every conceivable direction.
American
citizens are not merely “disappearing” without a trial, as happened those who
had comitted thoughtcrime in 1984, they are being directly assassinated via Predator
drone strikes with no oversight and no legal process whatsoever. As the case of
U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki shows, Americans are now at risk of falling victim to a program of
state-sponsored assassination should they be designated “terrorists”. In
Orwell’s 1984, miscreants were tortured and brainwashed, but they were not
murdered on a whim by government decree before at least being given the
opportunity to recant.
Technology
is being used to crush human liberty and eviscerate our privacy. Every
technological advancement, from Facebook to the IPhone, brings with it a further
assault on privacy. The U.S. judicial system is identifying ways to legalize
constant surveillance over every American, most recently with the effort to
give authorities the power to secretly track
Americans through clandestine global positioning systems attached to their vehicles.
What is the difference in terms of one's privacy whether you're
followed by a police officer for 12 hours and you don't see the officer or
whether you're monitored by GPS for 12 hours?" he asked.
First of all, why is the person being followed or stalked? The
difference is that one is a man and the other is a tool or technology. The man
can get tired, make a mistake, decide to not monitor him any more, while the
tool can record it all, save it and someone can review it or skim through it
looking for what they need.
I keep saying, I can careless if people see everything that I do, I
just want to make sure that we are all in agreement that murder or theft
(especially from our government via taxes (income tax)) is far more criminal
than someone smoking cannabis by themselves. You can monitor me all you want,
but when you start claiming that I am a criminal for something that doesn’t
hurt or abuse anybody else’s rights, then you are going down with me one way or
another!
Don’t make this ugly.